Priesthood's attack on Christ and God (Gaume, The catechism of perseverance, 2nd ed., 4 vols., 1883, vol. 2)

Text: "When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee. But there were certain of the scribes sitting there, and reasoning in their hearts, Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?" Mark 2:5-7 ; "And when he saw their faith, he said unto him, Man, thy sins are forgiven thee. And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?" Luke 5:20,21

Quote:

   Still more: suppose that the Redeemer comes down personally and visibly into a church, and takes up His place in a confessional to administer the Sacrament of Penance, while there is a Priest in another at hand. The Son of God says, I absolve you, and the Priest, on his part, says, I absolve you; in both cases, the penitents are alike absolved.

   Thus the Priest, as powerful as God, can in a moment snatch a sinner from hell, render him worthy of Paradise, and from a slave of the devil make him a child of Abraham. God Himself is bound to hold to the judgment of the Priest, to refuse or to grant pardon, according as the Priest refuses or grants absolution, provided the penitent is worthy of it. The sentence of the Priest precedes; God only subscribes to it. Can anyone conceive a greater, a higher dignity?

Gaume, Jean-Joseph, The catechism of perseverance; or, an historical, dogmatical, moral, liturgical, apologetical, philosophical, and social exposition of religion, from the beginning of the world down to our own days, trans. fr. 10th Fr. ed., 2nd ed., 4 vols., Dublin: M. H. Gill & Son, 1883, vol. 2, p. 547.

Online Source: books.google.ca/books?id=SNAHAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Book Images:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The open or incomplete pentagram (Goethe; Taylor, tr., Faust: a Tragedy, 1889)

Four kingdoms of Daniel 7 (Jamieson; Fausset; & Brown, A commentary, 1880, OT - vol. 2)

The satyr as representation of the devil (Réville, Histoire du diable, 1870)